Home Submit Story Placebo Blog Products Knights / Lifer Contact Us / About Us

Placebo Gazette #118

(Keeping Our Finger On The Prostate Of Medicine)
 
12/31/08

1.      Happy New Year!

2.      Gorback’s Thoughts by Michael Gorback MD

3.      Anyone Want To Be A Pilot For A Medical Home?

4.      I Smell Another Bailout Request

5.      Placebo Journal Update

6.      What's A State To Do?

7.      The Power of Disruption

8.      No Stark Violation This Christmas

9.      Medical Joke Of The Month

10. Finicky Eating Plan

11. Feedback About The Placebo Gazette 

 

1. Happy New Year!


Start making some resolutions as 2009 could be a tough year to handle. I expect a lot of change. As the tectonic plates of the healthcare system shift it is up to us whether we can take advantage of it or fall through those gigantic cracks. Since this millennium has started we have seen a tech crash, a real estate crash, and a financial crash. When the dust settles, however, the ones who survive will only be stronger and help us lead in the future. I wish you all the best and hope that this year positions you for that successful journey.

 FOLLOW THIS LINK TO COMMENT ON THIS STORY

2. Gorback’s Thoughts by Michael Gorback MD


Are you kidding me? Hospital services will get "the full rate of inflation" and we get -- maybe (they are "mulling" over it) -- 1.1%? They really do consider us impotent pond scum.

Modern Healthcare, December 5, 2008:

The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission has drafted recommendations to increase payment rates for inpatient and outpatient services at the full rate of inflation in 2010, concurrent with the implementation of a quality incentives program.


Although the draft didn't provide a specific increase for hospitals, the projected marketbasket update in 2010 for hospitals is 2.7 percent, reported Modern Healthcare. MedPAC revisited a proposal it has been trying to get Congress to approve for the past several years: to reduce the indirect medical education (IME) adjustment by 1 percentage point to help finance the quality incentives program for hospitals, Modern Healthcare noted. On other payment issues, the commission mulled over a draft recommendation to increase Medicare physician payments by 1.1 percent in 2010, the same increase doctors will receive in 2009, while commissioners also discussed options to make positive payment updates for ambulatory surgery centers contingent upon the submission of cost data to HHS, Modern Healthcare added. The draft recommendations will be voted on in January.


And then in the same issue, turn the other cheek. . . so we can slap you from the other side.


Medicare Advantage plans are expected to get paid 14 percent more than traditional fee-for-service in 2009, a slight uptick from 2008, according to new data released at the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission's December meeting. At least 9.9 million beneficiaries were enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans this year, a 16 percent increase from 2007, while it is estimated that Advantage plans were paid 13 percent more than traditional fee-for-service Medicare in 2008, reported Modern Healthcare. Among the various Advantage plan types, the controversial private fee-for- service plans will be getting paid 18 percent more than traditional Medicare next year, Modern Healthcare added.

FOLLOW THIS LINK TO COMMENT ON THIS STORY

3. Anyone Want To Be A Pilot For A Medical Home?


I just received this email from my state's family practice association asking for volunteers to be a medical home in its pilot program. They are planning a 3-year effort to implement the "medical home" model in 10-20 primary care practices from across the state beginning early next year. Three years for 10 -20 practices? That should be the first clue that they made this whole thing too complicated.

The subject of the email was entitled "Maine PCMH Pilot Seeking Practices to Participate". After a few paragraphs detailing some recent meetings, they ended the email with the following:


Among other requirements, primary care practices interested in participating in the pilot project are asked to commit to the following:


• To participate in the full duration of the Pilot, anticipated to be a 6-month pre-Pilot "Ramp Up" period, the 3-year Pilot, and a 3-month post-Pilot practice reassessment as part of the overall Pilot evaluation. Participation of Pilot practice sites means active participation of all health care professionals and staff in the practice.


• To complete an application for Patient Centered Medical Home certification using the National Committee for Quality Assurance's "Physician Practice Connection-Patient Centered Medical Home" assessment tool within four months (or sooner) of being notified of selection as a Pilot site and aiming to achieve "Level 1" certification within six months of being selected.


• To complete 1-2 additional tools assessing practice culture, such as the Practice Staff Questionnaire Microsystems Assessment Tool.


• To submit an authorization for release of claims data to PCMH Pilot staff and evaluation team for analysis of cost and quality measures both at baseline and over the course of the Pilot.


• To track and report the full set of Pilot clinical measures (yet to be determined) using the practice's electronic medical record or registry and to report clinical outcomes to the PCMH Pilot staff and evaluation team monthly.


• To fully implement the PCMH model, including achieving all PCMH "Core Commitments" within 12 months of beginning participation in the Pilot.


• To identify a "Leadership Team" within the practice to serve as champions for PCMH improvement efforts and to attend PCMH Learning Sessions. The Leadership Team at the practice must include (at a minimum) a lead physician or nurse practitioner, a practice administrator, and a clinical support staff.


• To participate in the PCMH Learning Collaborative, including consistent attendance by all members of the practice Leadership Team at 1-day Learning Sessions three times per year for the duration of the Pilot.


• To continually assess and improve care processes and structures within the practice, working in partnership with a Pilot Quality Improvement Coach.


• To participate actively in collaborative learning with other Pilot practices through sharing learning with other teams in Learning Sessions and participating in PCMH Pilot listserv discussions and Leadership Team conference calls.


• To negotiate and sign a contract amendment outlining the PCMH Pilot payment model with each payer participating in the Pilot.


• To participate in post-Pilot evaluation activities, including surveys and interviews with the evaluation team, to be completed within three months of completion of the Pilot.


It is anticipated that applications would be submitted by February 28, 2009. The exact number of practices participating in the Pilot will depend upon how many practices the health plans and MaineCare agree to support. It is anticipated the payment model for the Pilot will consist of a combination of fee for service, a per member per month fee, and shared savings. The health plans participating in the Pilot have not agreed on a uniform model of payment.


Wow. Who wouldn't want to volunteer for that? Sounds delish. I put the red highlights in to show some of the most outlandish parts. I could have made the whole thing red. I have blogged and written about the "medical home" concept before. This is not new. The above is just an example of how the higher ups in our medical organizations are getting involved and don't know what they are doing. They love this stuff. Of course it entails much more work by the doctor but that really doesn't matter. As long as it involves meetings and rules and standards, these "committee" people get orgasmic over it.

Putting aside how ridiculous and complicated they are making the "medical home" thing, there is something else that needs to be explored. These people in charge have NO clue how to sell their idea. One of the basic tenets of selling is the WIIFM or "what's in it for me?" philosophy. If you read this email, you won't find it. When you are peddling a ware you need to show an overt benefit to the customer. Where is the overt benefit above? How about some reasons to believe it is good for me and my practice? How will it make my life better? How about some dramatic examples of why it is a good thing? Hell, I would even take a testimonial or some anecdotal stories. This email is laughable and will fall on deaf ears or go into the trash bin. What they should be asking, and paying for, is someone to help them sell the concept. Since they won't do that, they will have to rely on the good old fashioned method of bullying doctors into it.

FOLLOW THIS LINK TO COMMENT ON THIS STORY

4. I Smell Another Bailout Request



A recent article from the Washington Post points out how many hospitals are struggling financially. To summarize, they are not immune to the investment losses that the rest of the country is dealing with. Of course they also have the issue of many patients who do not pay their bills. Other problems include:


  • donations are down
  • patient visits are flat
  • profitable diagnostic procedures and elective surgeries are declining
  • possible Medicare and Medicaid cuts
  • patients with high-deductible insurance who don't want to pony up

All this is leading to many hospitals closing their doors. Others are cutting down their staff or are eliminating services. They also have pared back on many upgrades. It just proves that a bad economy hits everyone, even the insulated medical system.


There is one small issue I have with this piece, however. The whole thing is given from the administrators perspective. Granted, they are the ones holding the purse strings but hospitals are notorious for not being transparent with their finances. There is no doubt in my mind that this whole article is a set-up by the American Hospital Association to help its members get in line for some of that federal bail out money. I could be wrong but my gut tells me otherwise. For many hospitals this money may be a life saver so I am not sure I am against them doing this. Wouldn't you want a hospital to be saved versus a Wall Street firm? I know I would. I only hope that some transparency does results from it. The article uses "threats" by administrators how they don't want to cut their medical staff but may have to. Why aren't the layers of administrators at risk? While we are at it, why aren't the CEOs salaries mentioned in this article? Cutting that back a smidgen would save a whole lot of nursing jobs.


FOLLOW THIS LINK TO COMMENT ON THIS STORY

 

5. Placebo Journal Update

 

 

We are halfway through our February issue and it is coming out great.  Wait until you see our ad for Wonderballz.    If you are interested in subscribing to the only print medical journal that will make you laugh (on purpose) then just click below:

 

SUBSCRIBE

 

 

6. What's A State To Do?

 



Many states are cutting Medicaid due to the economic pressures this country is going through. Is this a good thing? It's tough to say. I have worked in a Federal Qualified Health Center for over 10 years. I recently switched hospitals but I can't say that I have seen less Medicaid patients. Without making any stereotypical comments, I don't think I am out of bounds by calling them a complicated collection of souls. Probably due to their socioeconomic status, they tend to have many medical problems which can suck up a lot of our time in the office. The low reimbursement from the government is legend and many physicians can no longer afford to see Medicaid patients. This brings us to the newest problem involving their care. According to a new article in the Washington Post, some states are lowering payments to hospitals and nursing homes, eliminating coverage for some treatments, and forcing some recipients out of the insurance program completely. The bottom line is that any optional services that states had added, to what the federal government mandated had to be covered, is now being targeted for removal.


This is just more proof that some new health care system needs to get put in play very soon. Medicaid is not a very palatable plan for hospitals and doctors as it is. Taking a broad brush and cutting huge swaths of coverage may leave a lot of people in trouble. That does not mean that states couldn't do a better job investigating who should and should not be on Medicaid in the first place. I cannot tell you how many patients who are in their 20's that I have seen on Mainecare (our version of Medicaid) for ridiculous reasons: dyslexia, asthma (though they take no meds and smoke), mild depression, etc. I am not saying that these people don't need care but they also need to work and contribute more to society and themselves. We physicians are not immune to some of the injustices that plague our medical system. It tugs at my heart to see a working poor patient who has to pay cash for his ER visit for a chainsaw accident while a 27 year-old bounces in and out of the same place for supposed lower back pain (even though he sits at home playing XBOX 360 all day).


This economy is going to force a lot of cuts by the state governments everywhere. Many of these cuts are long overdue. Some, however, will hurt our patients undeservedly. We are only seeing the tip of the iceberg. I hope our medical organizations get a whiff of this in order to advocate for our patients or a lot of good people are going to be in a world of hurt. Literally.

 FOLLOW THIS LINK TO COMMENT ON THIS STORY

7.  The Power Of Disruption


"Hi, my name is Doug"



"Hi, Doug."



"And I am a disruptive physician."



It isn't easy admitting to this "label" anymore. Don't get me wrong, I don't buy into the definition given by the Joint Commission or hospitals or whomever has jumped on the bandwagon. That's the problem. The label "disruptive physician" is just that....a label. It can be defined in so many ways.



The New York Times put out a piece entitled Arrogant, Abusive and Disruptive — and a Doctor which tried to blame much of the problems in the hospital on these few doctors. The article even tried to make the claim that "disruptive physicians" are the cause for most medical mistakes. The problem is that the study they used was a survey and therefore inherently unscientific. The piece obviously was coming from a nursing point of view and much of what they have to say is valid. The example of the one nurse ducking scalpels being thrown at her was a little over the top, though.



Don't get me wrong, there are a lot of physicians that are arrogant and rude. As a lowly family doc, I get some of their wrath as well. Here was an example I spoke about at a lecture. As rude and belittling as this nephrologist was to me, I am not sure I would label her "disruptive". I have a few other labels I would use under my breath but it wouldn't be appropriate to share them here.



Some people are jerks; plain and simple. I remember nurses on the labor and delivery floor ganging up on a physician they didn't like. They tortured him and not because he was arrogant or rude to them. I remember being a medical resident and telling the nurse of the ICU patient I was caring for that I thought we needed to do a lumbar puncture. She replied, "Good for you" and walked away. Everyone has the ability to be jerks.



The problem with the term "disruptive behavior" is that it can be used as a weapon. Now JCAHO or Joint Commission or whatever they are called (asswipes?) are on the case. They recently issued a sentinel event alert on disruptive behavior that said "intimidating and disruptive behaviors include overt actions such as verbal outbursts and physical threats, as well as passive activities such as refusing to perform assigned tasks or quietly exhibiting uncooperative attitudes during routine activities. ... Such behaviors include reluctance or refusal to answer questions, return phone calls or pages; condescending language or voice intonation; and impatience with questions." Could they have cast a wider net? You have got to be kidding me. Even the AMA was questioning this.



More and more doctors are being labeled "disruptive physicians" by hospitals in order to force them to shut up. This is a problem. The definition by the Joint Commission only adds to the fire. It enables the hospitals to claim they have no choice but to label these doctors in order to achieve their accreditation. Meanwhile, they are just trying to get doctors to become lemmings.



Yes, there are arrogant and rude doctors and nurses and administrators. Yes, physically threatening someone or violent outbursts should not be tolerated. But speaking up, changing your voice intonation to make a point and fighting for what is right is not a crime. It may be disruptive but that kind of disruption is what's needed.



"My name is Doug. I am a disruptive physician. And I am proud of it."


FOLLOW THIS LINK TO COMMENT ON THIS STORY

8.  No Stark Violation This Christmas


Times have changed. Here I am in a small town in Maine and I recently received a "gift" from one of the local OBGYN physicians. It got me thinking how comfortable this time of year has gotten for everyone in the medical field. Years ago I would get a bottle of wine or even a thank you from local specialists to whom I would refer patients. It was nice to be recognized and it was also nice to see that they realized that I could send my patients to many different physicians but instead chose them. Don't get me wrong, I have never used this small power as a weapon or a way to make money (think Blagojevich) which is a Stark violation. I don't even know how that last part can be even accomplished? If the specialist gave good care and treated my patients well, however, then I would continue sending more patients their way. That being said, it is still good business to thank the little people (me). All this ran through my head as I opened my little gift from the OBGYN office. It was in a special bag with wrapping paper inside. There was a "personal" pre-printed letter addressed to the wrong person. In my case it was a nurse practitioner in a different office. My two other medical partners got the same "gift" and both had the wrong person on the header of the paper as well. Instead of a basic "thank you" in the letter there was information about Essure, a permanent birth control method. In fact, when I emptied the bag what fell out was two very small Ghirardelli chocolates and two large pamphlets about Essure. Nothing makes my heart feel warmer than a non-personalized 67 cent gift begging for a future referral. Times have changed. Happy holidays.

FOLLOW THIS LINK TO COMMENT ON THIS STORY

 

9. Medical Joke of the Week

 

Baby's First Doctor Visit

A woman and a baby were in the doctor's examining room, waiting for the doctor to come in for the baby's first exam.  The doctor arrived, and examined the baby, checked his weight, and being a little concerned, asked if the baby was breast-fed or bottle-fed. 

 'Breast-fed,' she replied.

  'Well, strip down to your waist,' the doctor ordered. 

She did.  He pinched her nipples, pressed, kneaded, and rubbed both breasts for a while in a very professional and detailed examination. 

Motioning to her to get dressed, the doctor said, 'No wonder this baby is underweight.  You don't have any milk.' 

 "I know,' she said, I'm his Grandma, but I'm glad I came.

10.  Finicky Eating Plan


Bless their little hearts. The government continues to try and help out its people by pushing such things as the food pyramid. The MyPyramid for Preschoolers interactive Web site is located at MyPyramid.gov and it does seem to have good ideas. I am just afraid that the little ones that need it the most are not really playing with their parents on these websites. I scanned the whole thing and didn't find a single game where I can kill someone or create a new persona in a fantasy world, etc. I understand that the site has some great ideas and suggestions but I question whether the interest by the parents of many at-risk kids may be there. The story in the Washington Post was obviously a PR piece and I sure hope it gets some traction. I am not sure these same parents of at-risk kids read the Washington Post but I'll keep my fingers crossed. The government officials who pushed to get this story out may be wondering what other options there are to spread the word? I'm thinking scratch off food pyramid lottery tickets to start. Or possibly putting the info on the back of cigarette packs. Okay, I'm being a little sarcastic but I do want to thank the government for trying and for continuing to feed us with the fodder that enables us at the Placebo Journal to create new jokes. Anyone up for a food sphinx?

FOLLOW THIS LINK TO COMMENT ON THIS STORY

                                                       

11. Feedback About The Placebo Gazette

 

 

I WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.  Please go to each individual story and follow the link the Placebo Journal Blog.  If you do not have access to the blog you can also post your thoughts under the WRITE A REVIEW section.   

 

Until next time, keep smiling, keep laughing and keep out of the sample closet.

Doug

King of Medicine   

 

Write Review | Read Reviews

Tell a Friend about the Placebo Gazette


Copyright © 2004-2010 Medpaste, LLC. All rights reserved.
Powered by Krack Media